Caught chunks of the debate last night. It's interesting that the conventional wisdom says that Bush's strength is foreign policy and Kerry's is domestic. The debates have proved exactly the opposite.
Debate # 1 dealing with foreign policy was a clear win for Kerry. Debate #2 on foreign and domestic policy was pretty close. But Debate #3 on domestic policy was a Bush slaughter. Bush was clearer, more wonkish, looked better, and was much more likeable. The media will spin a Kerry win, but most of the "unbiased" commentators I've seen have scored it a big Bush victory.
Thursday, October 14, 2004
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Bush was more wonkish? I'd love to have some of that Kentucky loco weed you're smoking. Just because W was finally able to put five words together without getting drool on his tie doesn't mean its a debate win. Make it 0 for 3. Oh, in case you hadn't noticed, JFK picked up the few independents that were left. All you've got left is election fraud, which your people are very skilled at, so I'm by no means dismissing a Bush victory.
Post a Comment